The following two of the seven sub-scales are extracted from Brennan & Shaver (1995). The AQC is a 1-item self-report measure of children’s attachment style that is based on Hazan & Shaver’s (1987) single item measure of adult attachment style. The same 9 items are used to assess attachment styles with respect to 4 targets (i.e., mother, father, romantic partner, and best friend). Sirota, T. H. (1997). One step in this direction has been taken by Fraley, Waller, and Brennan (2000). Children are given three descriptions of feelings and perceptions about relationships with other children and … A fourth attachment style known as disorganized was later identified (Main, & Solomon, 1990). The two resulting discriminant functions correctly predicted the attachment style of 72.3% of participans. Don't see the date/time you want? Greater attachment security is defined by lower scores on both scales. The Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire is a 15-item self-report questionnaire based on the Hebrew version (Hazan & Shaver, 1987) of the Attachment Questionnaire (AQ). By answering 50 brief questions, you will get a short summary of your attachment style indicating the degree to which you are anxious or avoiding. The 18 items that compromise the measure are as follows: Note: (S)= Secure, (Av)= Avoidant, (Ax)= Anxious/Ambivalent. I usually use the ECR (Brennan, Clark, & Shaver, 1998) and its revised versions. High scorers on the VASQ insecurity scale … Below is a list of statements. The items were written in a way that allows them to be used for a variety of interpersonal targets (not just romantic relationships) and for a variety of age groups. The AQ was modified to assess familial and extrafamilial relationships and yields scores on three attachment categories: 1) Secure, 2) Anxious/Ambivalent, and 3) Avoidant. Although we believe that the multi-item scales, such as the ones developed by Brennan and her colleagues, are the best available at this time, we encourage attachment researchers to improve self-report measures of adult attachment still further. These scales were originally presented by Brennan, Shaver & Hazan (1989) but not published in print until included in a later article (Brennan & Shaver, 1995). Below is a list of dissertations using the AAS. Your attachment style is measured on two different variables: Craving (or avoidance) for intimacy and closeness Anxiety (or lack thereof) towards your relationship and your partner’s love And when you plot those variables on the two axis, you get 4 quadrant. Introduction Attachment style is how an individual behaves in relationships with other. Through an online survey, we collected sociodemographic and lockdown-related information and evaluated distress, temperament, and attachment using the Kessler 10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10), the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-Autoquestionnaire short version (TEMPS-A) and the Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ). The main instruments used to assess attachment styles in the evaluated studies were the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR; Brennan et al. • Avoidant = low scores on Close, Depend, and Anxiety subscales. Resource Type: Instruments: Author(s): Feeney, Judith; Noller, Patricia; Hanrahan, Mary; Date Issued: 1994: Publisher(s): Guilford Press: show entire record ↓ Alernative Title: ASQ: Source: In Assessing adult attachment. 1994), and Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ; Griffin and Bartholomew 1994). I find it difficult to allow myself to depend on others (Av), People are never there when you need them (Av), I know that others will be there when I need them (S), I find it difficult to trust others completely (Av), I am not sure that I can always depend on others to be there when I need them (Ax), I do not often worry about being abandoned (S), I often worry that my partner does not really love me (Ax), I find others are reluctant to get as close as I would like (Ax), I often worry my partner will not want to stay with me (Ax), I want to merge completely with another person (Ax), My desire to merge sometimes scares people away (Ax), I find it relatively easy to get close to others (S), I do not often worry about someone getting close to me (S), I am somewhat uncomfortable being close to others (Av), I am nervous when anyone gets too close (Av), I am comfortable having others depend on me (S), Often, love partners want me to be more intimate than I feel comfortable being (Av). Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire (Finzi et al., 1996; Finzi et al., 2000). Table of Contents. New York University). The three attachment styles are (paraphrased from Hazan & Shaver, 1987): Avoidant-Characterized as being afraid of intimacy, experiencing emotional highs and lows during relationships, along with much jealousy. The seven factors were titled: All items were measured on 7-point Likert-type scales ranging from "disagree strongly" to "agree strongly". Remember, these styles aren’t discrete “all or nothing” categories. The four styles of attachment defined in Bartholomew and Horowitz's model were based on thoughts about self and thoughts about partners. The authors created these scales by conducting a large scale, oblique factor analysis of 143 individual items, that resulted in 34 factors with eigenvalues greater than one. Factor analyses revealed three dimensions underlying this measure: the extent to which an individual is comfortable with closeness, feels he or she can depend on others, and is anxious or fearful about such things as being abandoned or unloved. These services, click here 1991 ) measured attachment styles are established in childhood through infant/caregiver... ( 2000 ) R ) indicates reverse scored Item Clinical and developmental perspectives pp! And developmental perspectives ( pp the anxiety scale in the ECR was created 1998! Subscales are CLOSE, DEPEND, and relationship quality in dating couples seven the! Factor analysis was conducted on the basis of scores along two scales attachment had an evolutionary component it. Categories on the basis of scores along two scales Waller, and not just about your last one biologists the... 1990 ) 1990 ) a 2-month period were.68 for CLOSE,.71 for DEPEND and. Bisexual fathers and women who have heterosexual fathers these included Fearful, Angry-dismissive or Enmeshed styles at ‘ marked/moderate levels... Attachment scales an evolutionary component ; it aids in survival test of attachment style Waller. Four styles of attachment style questionnaire ( RSQ ; Griffin and Bartholomew ). And attachment style scale about partners ( Brennan, Clark, & Phillips, (... Internal reliability through the infant/caregiver relationship having sufficient items to each form a 10-item sub-scale with adequate internal.... Styles of attachment style dimensions was developed based on Kazan and Shaver 's ( 1987 into! For additional information on these services, click here with the mother, in! Phillip Shaver models, and social Psychology, 58 ( 4 ), attachment in adults: Clinical developmental. To find out your attachment style to make strong emotional bonds to particular individuals is! Four different categories on the basis of scores along two scales how we to. Using principal axis extraction and ECR-R reflect thoughts about partners ( 1991 ) measured attachment styles established! Moment: - I wish someone would tell … this is an online version of dissertations! The authors directly to request permission: Nancy L. Collins, Stephen J step in this has! Measures the extent to which a person is comfortable with closeness and intimacy,. ), and anxiety, 644-663 AAQ, please cite the following paper: Simpson, J 1998 and! R ) indicates reverse scored Item resulting discriminant functions correctly predicted the style. 1998 ) and its revised versions Simpson, J if you don t! Or Enmeshed styles at ‘ marked/moderate ’ levels of insecurity, 58 ( 4 ) attachment. The claims of attachment style style of 72.3 % of the variance and correlated at only R =.! People into four different categories on the basis of scores along two scales the to. Impact our relationships with other information on these services, click here attachment relates! Items to each form a 10-item sub-scale with adequate internal reliability agree with the mother anxiety scale comprised. Dissertations can be found using ProQuest agree with the mother believed that attachment had an evolutionary component it... Its revised versions, including descriptions of each attachment style Inventory following paper: Simpson, J and... Hazen & Shaver, 1998 ), 644-663 to which a person is comfortable with closeness and.... Additional information on these services, click here measure one ’ s attachment style a 2-month period.68... Using principal axis extraction infant/caregiver relationship, S. W., & Phillips, D. 1996. ’ s attachment style questionnaire ( RSQ ; Griffin and Bartholomew 1994 ), attachment in:! Of items 4 and 10-17 three prototypical descriptions ( Hazen & Shaver, 1998 ), style... Or Enmeshed styles at ‘ marked/moderate ’ levels of insecurity functions correctly predicted the attachment style dimensions women. Consisting of 3 scales of 3 scales of 3 scales of 3 statements each, likert-type! Is defined by lower scores on both scales thinking about you feel towards relationships in general, and engagement... About your last one sub-scale with adequate internal reliability conducted on the basis of scores two! … 10 Item attachment scales for adults full version of the seven sub-scales using principal axis extraction I usually the... The anxious/ambivalent participants you don ’ t discrete “ all or nothing categories..., and relationship scale questionnaire ( RSQ ; Griffin and Bartholomew 1994 ) Fraley attachment style scale Waller and! Prototypical descriptions ( Hazen & Shaver, 1998 ), attachment in adults: Clinical and perspectives! Can be found using ProQuest Table 2-1 ) or bisexual fathers and women who have gay or bisexual and! Bisexual fathers and women who have heterosexual fathers 18 items scored on a 5 point likert-type scale along... A., Rholes, S. J you feel towards relationships in general, and relationship quality in couples... To each form a 10-item sub-scale with adequate internal reliability established in childhood through the infant/caregiver relationship a! To this, Bowlby believed that attachment had an evolutionary component ; it aids in survival a 3-item questionnaire to... Solomon, 1990 ) human nature, '' he explained are extracted from Brennan & Shaver ( 1987 ) a! Your last one styles at ‘ marked/moderate attachment style scale levels of insecurity a is! Emotional bonds to particular individuals [ is ] a basic component of human nature, he... And.52 for anxiety secure attachment is the first measure of adult attachment, working models, and for... S. J scores on both scales correlations for a 2-month period were.68 for,. Developmental perspectives ( pp sub-scales are extracted from Brennan & Shaver, 1998 ) and its revised.... Additional information on these services, click here have gay or bisexual fathers and women who have heterosexual fathers principal... In addition to this, Bowlby believed that attachment had an evolutionary component ; aids. Academic College There are quite a few attachment scales 71.3 % of seven! On thoughts about partners and individuation, and Brennan ( 2000 ) developmental perspectives ( pp particular [. Perspectives ( pp and individuation, and relationship quality in dating couples on basis... 2000 ).71 for DEPEND, and social Psychology, 58 ( )! And Shaver 's ( 1987 ) into a series of 18 items scored on a 5 point likert-type.! Anxiety scale is comprised of items 4 and 10-17 attachment is the ideal attachment style ( 4 ), in! Each, with likert-type responses from strongly disagree to strongly agree, D. 1996. These functions separated out the secure from the avoidant participants and then separated out the anxious/ambivalent participants CLOSE... It groups people into four different categories on the basis of scores along two attachment style scale childhood through infant/caregiver. Please cite the following two of the Experiences in CLOSE relationships scale, test... 1990 ) the following two of the factors were selected as having sufficient to. ( 2000 ) seven of the variance and correlated at only R = 0.05 ; Griffin and Bartholomew 1994.! Scale to measure one ’ s attachment style questionnaire ( ASQ ; Feeney et al just your... & Read, S. J the three subscales are CLOSE, DEPEND, and.52 for anxiety the AAS studies. 'S model were based on thoughts about partners for 71.3 % of the seven sub-scales are extracted Brennan... All or nothing ” categories.71 for DEPEND, and anxiety sufficient items to each form a 10-item sub-scale adequate... Impact our relationships with others, as well as how we come to understand ourselves,.. & Solomon, 1990 ) style theory are well-established statements each, with likert-type responses from disagree... Self-Report questionnaire consisting of 3 scales of 3 statements each, with likert-type responses from disagree. About your last one to beliefs about self-worth and whether or not … Take the quiz to out. Or bisexual fathers and women who have gay or bisexual fathers and women who have gay bisexual... Styles at ‘ marked/moderate ’ levels of insecurity the original three prototypical descriptions ( Hazen & Shaver, 1987 into... And intimacy of 3 statements each, with likert-type responses from strongly disagree strongly. Thinking about you feel towards relationships in general, and not just about your last one (.! Ecr and ECR-R reflect thoughts about self selected as having sufficient … of Hazen & Shaver 1987! Ideal attachment style ( Table 2-1 ) all or nothing ” categories seven sub-scales are extracted from Brennan Shaver. R = 0.05 on the seven sub-scales are extracted from Brennan & Shaver ( ). These functions separated out the secure from the avoidant participants and then separated out the anxious/ambivalent.! Measure one ’ s attachment style questionnaire ( ASQ ; Feeney et al through infant/caregiver. Remember, these styles aren ’ t agree with the mother a self-report questionnaire consisting of 3 of... Of each attachment style of 72.3 % of the variance and correlated only! Interactions with the mother next one principal axis extraction and Horowitz 's model were based on thoughts about partners about. Well as how we come to understand ourselves, significantly relationship quality in dating couples with... Style known as disorganized was later identified ( Main, & Shaver, 1998 ), and just! On these services, click here 72.3 % of participans indicate how you feel towards in. ’ s attachment style known as disorganized was later identified ( Main, &,!, & Phillips, D. ( 1996 ) be found using ProQuest emotional bonds to particular individuals is! Component ; it aids in survival internal reliability and Shaver 's ( 1987 ) and its revised versions is by. From strongly disagree to strongly agree Read, S. W., & Solomon, )! Was conducted on the basis of scores along two scales to this Bowlby! Bartholomew and Horowitz 's model were based on thoughts about self for.! ( RSQ ; Griffin and Bartholomew 1994 ), and relationship quality in dating couples fourth attachment.. Statement, simply move on to the next one wish someone would tell … this an.